forum.alglib.net

ALGLIB forum
It is currently Wed Oct 24, 2018 5:34 am

All times are UTC


Forum rules


1. This forum can be used for discussion of both ALGLIB-related and general numerical analysis questions
2. This forum is English-only - postings in other languages will be removed.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Cash-Karp ODE solver needs a maxiter and/or min step size
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2018 2:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 2:14 am
Posts: 2
I've been trying to integrate rocket equation problems, and one thing that comes up is that for any rocket there is a very finite maximum theoretical burntime beyond which you've burned the last proton in the rocket, and accelerated it to infinite speed, infinitely far away. The value is also not much more than typical burntimes of a real rocket stage (usually about ~20% more). The behavior of the alglib ck integrator is that when you try to integrate beyond that timescale (which can happen when a wrapping optimizer is optimizing the time of the burn and takes too long of a step) is to just spin and never return (i suspect it is working very hard on a Xeno's Paradox kind of problem).

I can solve this reasonably easily in my own code by doing the calculation for when the rocket will burn completely and clipping the maximum x value passed to odesolverrkck(), but for other problems I'd imagine that could be computationally expensive or error prone to compute and it would better to have bounds in the routine itself. It also just feels unsafe to have an infinite loop as a possible failure mode.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cash-Karp ODE solver needs a maxiter and/or min step siz
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 4:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 2:14 am
Posts: 2
Another thing about the ODE solver is that it disallows integrating backwards in time and throws a rep.terminationtype of -2 "X is not ordered by ascending/descending".

The problem domain I'm interested in (spacecraft trajectory optimization) is fine with negative time integration of initial and terminal coast periods. They just correspond to either starting the maneuver earlier than estimated, or arriving at the target orbit later than estimated.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group